DEMOCRACY Politician

When we deal with elections in them comes right-hander to the thought the word ‘ ‘ DEMOCRACIA’ ‘ , that espelha the will of the people in choosing those where we believe to be enough good it stops of certain form representing our desires and yearnings in legislative and the executive one. However such will of the people already more is nowadays not respected, or better, she is not more so sovereign as it would have to be, if really already was one day, we can until saying that it does not emanate the people more than. Summarizing us it the scene politician of our been beloved of the Paraba, sends in them to the past where the coronelismo reigned, our governing were predefined without the popular consensus, the society did not have force. What we see today is people fighting not to leave the power, people are leaving to exert its paper also conquered in the ballot boxes to stop taking off the other of the power for mere whim, are the way politician it been to stop its activities in favor of a sufficiently personal quarrel of two blocks politicians. The creature if return against its creators in a ferocity gesture, animosity anxiety for the supremacy politics in the state, is to want to beat to permanence records the front of state executive e, above all, to prove that it can move all a machine to make to be valid its vanity and credibility. Sad it is the fact to see that the will emanated for the people if sinks in way as much shoot out accusation politician and replies, thus leaving with that the DEMOCRACY, a time object of the conquest of the people, has been forgotten and disrespected, because we are even we them detainers of the power, as exactly it says to be the DEMOCRACY. We are direct and indirectly obliged to leave our armed document houses to face for more than the giant times lines in order to express our will politics so that, in the end of the accounts, terms our expression extinguished or forgotten by a whim some that want exactly is the power.

The Nonsense To Obey

This is what in rule it occurs. However as to prepare a child so that, when it grows, it has discernment to follow a rule. More than what this, as to make with that this child understands the reason of the elaboration of such rule, its efficiency. To propitiate an education that not condiz with the behavior of the parents makes with that the children do not understand the importance to respect a law.

In proper the half familiar contradiction he predominates when, for example, if he teaches that if does not have to lie, however the parents promise things and later they finish not fulfilling. Keep up on the field with thought-provoking pieces from Nancy-Ann_DeParle. With this the child concludes that to reach definitive objective it ‘ ‘ pode’ ‘ or she must lie. To the step that individual, that was until then a confused child how much what it is certain missed e, is regulated not more by the authority of the father, but of the State, a shock is caused such intense one that it can make with that this individual does not obtain to adapt itself half to this new. Therefore in view of the beginning of the isonomy, in which all are equal before the law, the paternal figure does not exist to give one second possibility, since the State does not deal with as much benevolence that it infringes a norm. The question that must be made is; how then an individual will go to obey a law, if since child it has as example the parents who if contradict the all moment? This individual perceives to the law as something that can be applied only at some moments. However when it is come across with a State that does not tolerate half term, occurs the shock. It would be incompressible to say that the obedience does not occur for pure and simple choice of the individual, if during all its life was molded in this way. A nonsense for in such a way demanding can be considered that a young that did not have the minimum of clarification on the part of the parents of what it is certain what is missed, answers for its acts of form conscience.

It is difficult to play when one learns the rules of wrong form. When then it is acted of form relatively natural, strong it is reprehended. The State if makes present only at the moment to punish, while it would have to fill the vacuum left for the parents. How then to demand obedience of that only apanha? The functioning of the State if of in such a way, but sins when carrying through only the punitive aspect, if omits in the remain of the re-education process. As if the simple fact to punish it made with that the mentality of an agent started to be more correct.