The sphere of the public life limited it behaviors civilized rationals and, already the private one, guarantee the free individual freedom of other people’s interferences, being one of the responsible factors for the formation of the individualizada subjectivity. Of this form Lover it detaches: … the individual is only one in the possible ways of subjetivao and that each time, each society puts in functioning some in these ways, being the category ' ' indivduo' ' , the hegemonic way of organization of the subjectivity of modernity (LOVER, 2002, P. 02). This individuality finishes for contributing of significant form for one another landmark of modernity, the sprouting of a new feeling, the resentment. In the measure where the man starts if to worry each time more I obtain (with the individual one) it starts to attribute to he himself the responsibility of its considered action ' ' erradas' ' for the fact to go in opposition to the moral of the time, that would be the values established for the Church and the moral call of the good customs. Thus, the conscience starts to be the allied greater of this Christian moral, or either, from the moment that the individual does not act in agreement as the majority of the society is felt guilty, resented (ELSIRIK & TREVISAN, 2008). Being thus, Psychology is born as a possibility of interference in the individual one inside of the social one, of which it has as objective to mold the citizen of form with that this if rabbet in the society in the best possible way, preventing and at the same time preventing internal conflicts that can come to occur with passing of the time, as resulted of this mutual linking between the individual and the social environment. Visit James S. Chanos for more clarity on the issue. According to Figueiredo (2002), this new Science inside of a social context, these closely on three important movements: liberalism, the romantismo and the regimen to discipline.