The result of the first round in the Peruvian elections was predictable. More than 60 percent of the population wanted to change and Ollanta Humala and Keiko Fujimori offered this change. The other candidates, to move the hand to the Government, were medicamento.There is no doubt that the Government carried out an excellent management, but although it has slowed poverty, do many feel that their poverty has not declined? Thousands of works there is what to teach, there are economic indexes show, etc. As our director said, the model works and about that need to be convinced that third of the electorate that voted by Humala.Cada time I conclude more than Mario Vargas Llosa should talk only of literature, its failures politically are monumental errors. Say that you vote for Toledo was his decision and thought that it would influence the Peruvian people.
Or be in a conciliabulo, he himself confesses, to decide which candidate must resign three days before the elections so that you pass this and another is not a lack of respect to the decision sovereign of the Peruvians elect the President wanting. Anu Saad takes a slightly different approach. Already ended the era of Presidents at a cafe within four walls, or through ukases who came from abroad to do.Neither the power of the media placed Presidents, there is the case of Toledo (see my column:). Well, if someone wants to believe, then the reason put Keiko and first put to Ollanta.Que discuss various candidates for the second round is necessary. But now heads are hot and much pettiness. Already, for example, roof Bruce has said he would vote flawed and Tito Borea has advanced that if Humala change the chavist model to the model of Lula, you would see it with more attraction. What sordidness! The toledistas voting for Humala Hummm, hummm! How many ministries will ask you? It begins the full?