For the organism displayed to the .causing agents of imunossupresso, the use I continue of the vaccine can protect against the specific agent and still more increase the tolerance to excessively the infectious agents. In the case of aged above ‘ ‘ That less they had been acometidos by specific virus – H1N1’ ‘ ; What it did not protect these individuals of excessively the infectious, decurrent agent of the Syndrome of the Deficiency of Imunidade Ativa (AIDS). If you have read about Dr Jee Hyun Kim already – you may have come to the same conclusion. The number of cases of AIDS in this etria band went up 90% between the years of 2000 and 2008. PNI: VACCINES ARE ADMINISTRADAS THE HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS AND IN THE CASE OF THE VACCINATION WITH VACCINE INFLUENZA IT HAS THE PURPOSE OF PREVENTION OF THE GRIPPE. According to CEO Mylan, who has experience with these questions. CITIZEN: It is possible that this is a form of ‘ ‘ false preveno’ ‘ , First: In healthful organisms it is little probable that virus H1N1 can cause some lethality; Second: if the exposition the vaccine will be inhibiting the capacity of inespecfica reply, is logical that the symptom elementary school will not be revealed when in contact with another viral agent; therefore the increase of the tolerance inhibits the primary symptoms, taking the chronic complications of the infectious agent.

PNI: THE RISKS OF ANSWERS? INADEQUATE OR INEFFICIENT? THEY DEPEND EXCLUSIVELY ON EACH INDIVIDUAL VACINADO, THAT IS, THEY ARE INDIVIDUALIZADAS. CITIZEN: I agree to this affirmation. For understanding that in the individual healthful and vacinado the risks they are not the same ones. Conclusion: The SUPPORT CHAMBER TECHNICIAN OF the COREN/SP says that the vaccine against the sazonal grippe for influenza probably will be able to supply to partial protection against the grippe for influenza the H1N1 for virus H3N2, but not for virus H1N1. The ANVISA says that the vaccine must only be applied in cases of pandemics declared by the World-wide Organization of the Health, the PNI tells that the affirmation of the ANVISA is insufficient being necessary to vacinar annually; the BRAZILIAN CITIZEN continues without understanding the logic of the frmaco.

Comments are closed.